The model letter is WAY more sane and reasonable than the OpenSRS version.
Moving the language about providing false info to the top was a bad move on
OpenSRS's part - it comes across as threatening and confusing - the part
"ICANN ... has determined..." comes across as legalese to the first time
reader and people don't react well to legalese.
I'm with everyone else who says PLEASE use something much more in line with
the sample. If not, at least make the beginning of the message friendly
enough that people will be willing to read the whole thing so we don't get
calls from customers who knee-jerk react at the prospect of their domain
being taken away.
-Russ
At 12:48 AM 11/7/2003, Robert L Mathews wrote:
>Oops -- there was a missing-word typo in my previous message. My
>apologies for the extra post, but just so it's clear, my message should
>have said:
>
>"...the model WDRP letter suggested by ICANN doesn't even mention WHOIS."
> ^^^^^^
>
>(I'm referring to the model letter at
>http://www.icann.org/registrars/wdrp.htm, which actually seems to be a
>pretty good template.)
>
>--
>Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies http://www.tigertech.net/
>
>"I'm angry about so many things that I'm having trouble even keeping
>track of them."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:50 EDT