On 2/9/2004 2:33 PM Joe Baptista noted that:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>
>
>>On 2/9/2004 1:13 PM Joe Baptista noted that:
>>
>>
>>>sounds expensive.
>>
>>Intended to be expensive - for the loser. They are "loser pay"
>>proceedings.
>>
>>The policy is sufficiently defined that violations are going to be few
>>and far between unless someone is wilfully violating the policy. It
>>won't take that many $1500 administrative bills before the behaviour
>>will be permanently corrected.
>
>
> I understand - does tucows pay the fee initially or the domain owner who
> has the problem?
Without re-reading the policy, I can't remember if the registrar is
required to pay or prevented from paying or if the policy is silent...
If the policy is silent, then Tucows specific policy is certainly TBD...
---rwr
"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions. All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:54 EDT