James M Woods wrote:
>Kaz,
>
>We have no immediate plans to offer second level .name domains at this time.
>Market demand has proven less than worthwhile with respect to .name.
>
>(Scary fact) We have way more resellers than we do .name domains registered.
>That is not a viable indicator of that TLD's success. Should demand increase
>we will reconsider, however I am not inclined to devote further resources to
>this TLD since the ROI is deep in the negative.
>
>
I think the problem is not with .name, but that simply noone wants a 3rd
level domain. We has not been offering .name because it just did not fit
in with all the regulations and problems. However, I think there would
be a demand if 2nd level were available.
- Csongor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:54 EDT