On 4/9/2004 11:35 PM Jim McAtee noted that:
> How can Tucows policy be to advocate having a reseller do something that
> could potentially jeopardize the customer's domain, and something that is
> about to become illegal? Who, besides the reseller could determine that
> it was the reseller and not the registrant that provided the false
> information. And what difference would it make from a legal standpoint?
My vague recollection of the policy that I haven't looked at for a year
is that a reseller can enter their own information in place of the
registrant's as long as the registrant agrees to this displacement (ie -
via an agency agreement). When handled properly, the info isn't false,
its just not leading directly to the registrant's front door...
-- Regards,-rwr
"In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one indispensable condition for social progress." - Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:55 EDT