Jim McAtee wrote:
> How can Tucows policy be to advocate having a reseller do something that
> could potentially jeopardize the customer's domain, and something that is
> about to become illegal? Who, besides the reseller could determine that
> it was the reseller and not the registrant that provided the false
> information. And what difference would it make from a legal standpoint?
There's is a difference between anonymizing and providing false information.
We anonymize for our clients who request it by supplying *our*
information. As long as we can contact the client in question, it's
correct contact information for them, so no law or rule is broken.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:55 EDT