Michael,
Harsh and way off mark. PIR is pretty responsive to issues which are
actually brought forward to them. Their court docket is pretty light
compared to some other registries :-S
Play nice now ;)
James
On 7/2/04 6:18 PM, "Michael Dean" <michaelldean@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> PIR.org have risen to their level of incompetence. It is a laughing
> stock with companies such as cisco, etc. From what I hear, no one
> really has a relationship with them, just court appearances.
>
> Jeff Wasilko wrote:
>
>> .org was dead from large parts of the net yesterday for more than
>> 2 hours:
>>
>> http://www.cymru.com/DNS/gtlddns-o.html
>>
>> This is at least the 2nd time this has happened (last time I have
>> recorded is 10/16/2003).
>>
>> The outages on both occasions have been side-effects of the fancy
>> anycast announcements that UltraDNS use for .org. They only
>> include 2 hostnames in the NS records for .org:
>>
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> org. 86400 IN NS TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET.
>> org. 86400 IN NS TLD2.ULTRADNS.NET.
>>
>> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
>> TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET. 166716 IN A 204.74.112.1
>> TLD2.ULTRADNS.NET. 74600 IN A 204.74.113.1
>>
>>
>> Is there someone within Tucows/OpenSRS that has a relationship with PIR
>> and could help bring this to their attention? .org shouldn't be less
>> reliable than .com/.net, but since PIR.org took it over it has been MUCH
>> less reliable.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -j
>>
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:58 EDT