On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:28:33PM -0400, James M Woods wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Harsh and way off mark. PIR is pretty responsive to issues which are
> actually brought forward to them. Their court docket is pretty light
> compared to some other registries :-S
Yeah, I agree. This problem isn't directly caused by PIR, and
hopefully they can get the folks that can fix it (UltraDNS) to do
something.
-j
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:58 EDT