On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:19:08 -0400
> From: Ross Wm. Rader <ross@tucows.com>
> To: Dave Warren <MailList@devilsplayground.net>
> Cc: askodric@b92.net, Gordon Hudson <gordon@hostroute.net>,
> Neil Anderson Saunders <neil@ednetisp.net>,
> nom-discuss@lists.nominet.org.uk, discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: Re: Domain Registry Services
>
> On 7/28/2004 10:04 PM Dave Warren noted that:
>
>
> > How about where the domain is owned by a company rather then an
> > individual? It's common for a company to use the company name as the
> > "real name", and/or a roll account.
>
> In this case, the Administrative Contact would be required to authorize
> the request. This is a big change over the current policy where
> basically anyone can hold themselves out to be a representative of the
> registrant. The new policy tightens this down significantly...example...
>
> microsoft.com
>
> Registrant: Microsoft Corp.
> Admin Contact: Joe Smith, System Admin
> Transfer authorized by: Bill Gates, on behalf of "Microsoft Corp."
>
> Technically, this is an illegitimate authorization. Even though Bill is
> authorized to act on Microsoft's behalf, the only real party authorized
> to transfer this name is the admin contact seeing as how the Registrant
> really can't authorized it themselves (being that its a company, not a
> person...)
And the situation if the Admin contact is itself a role account?
Mark.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:58 EDT