on 7/31/04 9:13 PM, Swerve at Swerve@swerve.com wrote:
> on 7/31/04 7:19 PM, bill@daze.net at bill@daze.net wrote:
>
>>> For me, both whois and domain availability should be a priority for the RWI
>>> interface. I've been a reseller using the RWI for 4 and a half years. Imo,
>>> these type of fundamental tools should have been implemented years ago.
>>
>> We should remember that the RWI (aka quickstart) was intended to allow
>> someone to get started right away while they installed the client code or
>> their own custom system. I'm a bit surprised that you've been putting up
>> with using the RWI for so long without installing at least the client
>> code. ;)
>
> I wonder if there are 100's or more resellers using the RWI?
>
> The intention (install code) you speak of was always a mistake, in my
> opinion.
I should clarify this a bit. What i meant was that the RWI and install code
should be both equally encouraged/available/usable.
sW
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:58 EDT