Huh? Just what don't I get here? You think I'm against the drop market? That's
nonsense. I love it. Defend it.
What I'm suggesting here is that Tucows engage in the drop market in a way
that empowering users, rather that simply extract maximum value for themselves
as does Pool, Snap, and Enom. What ever happened to loyality?
You realize that Enom already has a high bidder at the drop, yet they continue
the auction afterwards to ensure THEY gain maximum benefits. Who are they
REALLY thinking of?
Loren
JB <info@bwp.net> wrote:
> Yea right... I think TUCOWS should stay out of the drop market. It will
> "empower" to many citizens to join the fishfry and drive up the prices.
>
> Welcome to capitalism.
>
>
>
> Loren Stocker wrote:
>
> > This, too, is self-serving. Like Pool, "two or more bidders" enter a
> private
> > auction after enom grabs the bait. Like Lemmings, they are, all driving
into
> > the "Pool.com"
> >
> > What I like to see is a service that EMPOWERS users, rather than yet
another
> > service designed to extract maximum revenues at the expense of
convenience.
> >
> > Best, Loren
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Oct 19 2004 - 23:37:58 EDT