RE: Domain security a registry issue (WAS: Re: More Stolen Domains -- not FUD)

From: 7 List (list@domainmonger.net)
Date: Wed Jan 19 2005 - 12:40:54 EST


In what other industry do you think this is being done properly?
Banks certainly do their own authentication and authorization.

- AL

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org [mailto:owner-discuss-list@opensrs.org]
On Behalf Of Roger B.A. Klorese
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 10:32 AM
To: ross@tucows.com
Cc: Robert L Mathews; discuss-list@opensrs.org; dam@icann.org
Subject: Re: Domain security a registry issue (WAS: Re: More Stolen Domains
-- not FUD)

Ross Rader wrote:

> I thought we were talking about fraudulent transfers? The logical
> behavior you describe is only typically applicable in legitimate
> instances. The boundary case is actually a fraudulent transfer on the
> anniversary.

I was addressing the general issue of the conflict of interest inherent
in having someone woh has a profit motive being the party to whom one
must authenticate and authorize.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jan 31 2005 - 23:00:02 EST