On Mar 7, 2005, at 11:30 PM, Loren Stocker wrote:
> Yeah, but who gives an agent the right of seizure?
>
The clause they put in their contract that allows them to modify the
contract without telling the customer, maybe?
Later, when no one is looking, they add a clause allowing them to sell
the unpaid name without deleting it.
Similar in methodology to eNom who I believe added a clause saying they
could register names on the client's behalf without the clients
approval, then went and regged a bunch of .info names and injected them
into people's accounts.
> How would you feel if phone company seized your phone number due to a
> 36 day
> non-payment? Something's wrong with this picture.
>
> Best, Loren
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> Received: 04:54 PM PST, 03/07/2005
> From: bill@daze.net
> To: Ross Rader <ross@tucows.com>Cc: Loren Stocker <loren@800.net>,
> Chuck
> Hatcher <chatcher@ashland-ky.net>, discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: Re: NSI-- What Arrogance!
>
>> Honoring the redemption grace period is mandatory for all
>> names that get deleted
>
> Thinking like NSI, I believe the keyword here is "deleted". NSI
> doesn't
> delete the domain so they believe they don't have to honor the
> redemption
> grace period.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Mar 31 2005 - 23:00:01 EST